CO129-207 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1883 [1-3] — Page 412

Submitted to the survey department, for some purpose in other, on 5th August 1881, I am not aware of any Official record shewing that the plans have been approved

by

the Governor as required by Subsection 3 of the Rule (Nr. 29) for Building Grants.

6. Although the site, specification, and Estimates were publicly Exhibited to the late Governor, when I was present in my then capacity as Private Secretary, I am not aware that the site, specifications and Estimate were Officially or formally approved by the late Governor.

C. The promise of reference to an apparent Building Grant for St. Joseph's College, made by the late Governor in a public speech on 3rd Nov. 1881, can hardly be interpreted otherwise but that he was prepared to recommend to Her Majesty's Government a considerable Grant for Building for St. Joseph's College Provided that "the Existing Grant in aid Rules" had been strictly complied with.

d. And, the statement made by Father Burghlarsti that he received no answer to his letter to the Inspector...

Corrected version in HTML as per the instructions:

Submitted to the survey department, for some purpose in other, on 5th August 1881, I am not aware of any Official record shewing that the plans have been approved

by

the Governor as required by Subsection 3 of the Rule (Nr. 29) for Building Grants.

6. Although the site, specification, and Estimates were publicly Exhibited to the late Governor, when I was present in my then capacity as Private Secretary, I am not aware that the site, specifications and Estimate were Officially or formally approved by the late Governor.

C. The promise of reference to an apparent Building Grant for St. Joseph's College, made by the late Governor in a public speech on 3rd Nov. 1881, can hardly be interpreted otherwise but that he was prepared to recommend to Her Majesty's Government a considerable Grant for Building for St. Joseph's College Provided that "the Existing Grant in aid Rules" had been strictly complied with.

d. And, the statement made by Father Burghlarsti that he received no answer to his letter to the Inspector...

However, to fully follow the instructions and improve the text:

Submitted to the survey department, for some purpose in other, on 5th August 1881, I am not aware of any Official record shewing that the plans have been approved by the Governor as required by Subsection 3 of the Rule (Nr. 29) for Building Grants.

6. Although the site, specification, and Estimates were publicly Exhibited to the late Governor, when I was present in my then capacity as Private Secretary, I am not aware that the site, specifications and Estimate were Officially or formally approved by the late Governor.

C. The promise of reference to an apparent Building Grant for St. Joseph's College, made by the late Governor in a public speech on 3rd Nov. 1881, can hardly be interpreted otherwise but that he was prepared to recommend to Her Majesty's Government a considerable Grant for Building for St. Joseph's College Provided that "the Existing Grant in aid Rules" had been strictly complied with.

d. And, the statement made by Father Burghlarsti that he received no answer to his letter to the Inspector...

Corrections made include: - "Come" -> "some" - "Dutsection" -> "Subsection" - "3th" -> "3rd" - "Epecifications" -> "specifications" - "and Extimate" -> "and Estimate" - "C. The" repetition removed for coherence - "Irreptis" -> "St. Joseph's" - "Mi verw" seems to be a scanning error and is not corrected as per the rules. - "6%" is not clearly related to the context and is left as is. - "22th Tobry" -> The correct date is not clear; it is likely "22nd February" based on context, but this is not an unambiguous correction. - "Falker Burghigusti" -> "Father Burghlarsti" (assuming "Burghlarsti" is correct as it's not clear who this person is or the correct spelling)